Search for: All records

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are quickly gaining traction as a viable alternative to deep neural networks (DNNs). Compared to DNNs, SNNs are computationally more powerful and energy efficient. The design metrics (synaptic weights, membrane threshold, etc.) chosen for such SNN architectures are often proprietary and constitute confidential intellectual property (IP). Our study indicates that SNN architectures implemented using conventional analog neurons are susceptible to side channel attack (SCA). Unlike the conventional SCAs that are aimed to leak private keys from cryptographic implementations, SCANN (SCA̲ of spiking n̲eural n̲etworks) can reveal the sensitive IP implemented within the SNN through the power side channel. We demonstrate eight unique SCANN attacks by taking a common analog neuron (axon hillock neuron) as the test case. We chose this particular model since it is biologically plausible and is hence a good fit for SNNs. Simulation results indicate that different synaptic weights, neurons/layer, neuron membrane thresholds, and neuron capacitor sizes (which are the building blocks of SNN) yield distinct power and spike timing signatures, making them vulnerable to SCA. We show that an adversary can use templates (using foundry-calibrated simulations or fabricating known design parameters in test chips) and analysis to identify the specifications of the implemented SNN. 

Spiking Neural Networks (SNN) are fast emerging as an alternative option to Deep Neural Networks (DNN). They are computationally more powerful and provide higher energy-efficiency than DNNs. While exciting at first glance, SNNs contain security-sensitive assets (e.g., neuron threshold voltage) and vulnerabilities (e.g., sensitivity of classification accuracy to neuron threshold voltage change) that can be exploited by the adversaries. We explore global fault injection attacks using external power supply and laser-induced local power glitches on SNN designed using common analog neurons to corrupt critical training parameters such as spike amplitude and neuron’s membrane threshold potential. We also analyze the impact of power-based attacks on the SNN for digit classification task and observe a worst-case classification accuracy degradation of −85.65%. We explore the impact of various design parameters of SNN (e.g., learning rate, spike trace decay constant, and number of neurons) and identify design choices for robust implementation of SNN. We recover classification accuracy degradation by 30–47% for a subset of power-based attacks by modifying SNN training parameters such as learning rate, trace decay constant, and neurons per layer. We also propose hardware-level defenses, e.g., a robust current driver design that is immune to power-oriented attacks, improved circuit sizing of neuron components to reduce/recover the adversarial accuracy degradation at the cost of negligible area, and 25% power overhead. We also propose a dummy neuron-based detection of voltage fault injection at ∼1% power and area overhead each.